VS. 
In a recent article published in DNA Money: http://www.dnaindia.com/money/interview_it-is-not-easy-to-compete-with-kirana-stores-rajiv-lal_1416054
There were comparisons made between the strengths of Walmart and the strengths of the Kirana Shop. While Walmart might take over large consumer bases with its bulk and cheap prices, Kirana Shops have service and relationships that Walmart will be able to compete with...
General Description:
1. Purchases product on ad-hoc basis from wholesaler at haats (varied)
2. No sales reporting, no stock tracking, no regular purchase schedule
3. Gets avg. 10% margin on FMCG
Challenges
1. Inability to manage products or set a clear purchase pattern
2. Cannot manage funds , lack of financial planning
3. Too dependent on outside demand - do not attempt to create demand for products
Frontier Markets believes that Kirana Shops are the BEST suppliers for local households because there is a trust factor, convenient location, and these shops service households in various ways.
Through our model, Frontier Markets will build a network of retailers that are not only providing similar services and maintaining relationships, but they will be providing demanded products with high quality backing.
We will be building their capacity in the following ways:
1. Bring them into a network of preferred retailers
2. Build capacity for marketing and sales reporting
3. Provide consistent demand for products from FM field staff activities with BOP
consumers
4. Tie retailer to consumer, wholesaler and MNC company
Added Value
1. Better Sales Performance: Increased sales from consistent, aggregated consumer base and consistent demand
2. Better Margins: Gets better margins from FM wholesaler
3. Competitive Advantages: Marketing and sales knowledge is a
competitive advantage to other shops
4. Performance Rewards: High performers are rewarded directly
from the MNC
Saturday, July 31, 2010
Walmart vs. Kirana Shops
Sunday, July 11, 2010
Microfinance Institutions Stepping into the Non-FInancial Game
In the past few days, Frontier Markets has been examining a few MFIs that are beginning to think about ways to support this new demand for consumer durables and other non-financial needs for low income households. Many have started creating their own non-financial business development team focusing on healthcare, education and energy. Others have begun using their non-profit arm to vet proposals before starting pilots on the ground.... all sounds great, right?
EVERYONE love a PILOT, and EVERYONE works to make sure a PILOT is successful... but what about Scale?!!!
Here are some of the challenges FM forsees for SCALABILITY...
• Staff, Staff, Staff!: right now, neither the MFI nor the “Product Company” have sufficient resources to continue educating, marketing and monitoring products to MFI members. In a pilot, there are a few company reps that work with the MFI field staff to provide such services, but this is NOT SCALABLE. The sheer costs to involve a MFI field staff for any of the aforementioned services is just too high. A product company needs to invest in that resource, but for one product, again, too high of a cost!
• Casual Sales to Meeting Targets: during pilots, we are all gauging whether a product will sell, so targets are NOT the focus. However, once we’re at scale, suddenly it is about targets, margins, and field staff incentives. Marketing and education become sales goals – it is difficult for an MFI to balance company expectations and their own loan portfolio.
• Diversified Loan Portfolios: MFIs have JUST started thinking about consumer financing… they do NOT have energy, healthcare, or consumption loan products at the moment. The question is, is it worth processing a rs. 800-2000/- loan? Most MFIs argue the cost implication – its just too high to begin creating separate loans…
Long Term Solutions:
• Building an independent non-financial staff to educate, market and monitor products and services to MFI members: having separate field staff is really the only solution to maintain quality of interaction and understanding of products. This field force will become the point of contact for all members, providing them with assistance and support on products.
• Creating realistic targets at a pace where loans can be processed and determined by the member’s capacity to purchase: the MFI has a responsibility to gauge movement of products and sales cycles. It is unrealistic to assume that a large MFI’s member base will definitely purchase every product introduced in this setting. Targets should reflect demand assessments.
• Creating energy, healthcare, product portfolios and providing a line of credit: if MFIs can understand the range of products that are in demand in each sector, they can determine a maximum loan size that can be reformed for specific products. A women can use that line of credit to purchase 4-5 consumer durables in 4 to 5 years…
EVERYONE love a PILOT, and EVERYONE works to make sure a PILOT is successful... but what about Scale?!!!
Here are some of the challenges FM forsees for SCALABILITY...
• Staff, Staff, Staff!: right now, neither the MFI nor the “Product Company” have sufficient resources to continue educating, marketing and monitoring products to MFI members. In a pilot, there are a few company reps that work with the MFI field staff to provide such services, but this is NOT SCALABLE. The sheer costs to involve a MFI field staff for any of the aforementioned services is just too high. A product company needs to invest in that resource, but for one product, again, too high of a cost!
• Casual Sales to Meeting Targets: during pilots, we are all gauging whether a product will sell, so targets are NOT the focus. However, once we’re at scale, suddenly it is about targets, margins, and field staff incentives. Marketing and education become sales goals – it is difficult for an MFI to balance company expectations and their own loan portfolio.
• Diversified Loan Portfolios: MFIs have JUST started thinking about consumer financing… they do NOT have energy, healthcare, or consumption loan products at the moment. The question is, is it worth processing a rs. 800-2000/- loan? Most MFIs argue the cost implication – its just too high to begin creating separate loans…
Long Term Solutions:
• Building an independent non-financial staff to educate, market and monitor products and services to MFI members: having separate field staff is really the only solution to maintain quality of interaction and understanding of products. This field force will become the point of contact for all members, providing them with assistance and support on products.
• Creating realistic targets at a pace where loans can be processed and determined by the member’s capacity to purchase: the MFI has a responsibility to gauge movement of products and sales cycles. It is unrealistic to assume that a large MFI’s member base will definitely purchase every product introduced in this setting. Targets should reflect demand assessments.
• Creating energy, healthcare, product portfolios and providing a line of credit: if MFIs can understand the range of products that are in demand in each sector, they can determine a maximum loan size that can be reformed for specific products. A women can use that line of credit to purchase 4-5 consumer durables in 4 to 5 years…
Friday, July 2, 2010
From Bombay to Delhi
Frontier Markets has been interacting with interesting social enterprises, MNCs, and social investors in Bombay. We are now preparing for our next city, Delhi where we will meet with MFI networks as well.
In Bombay:
Yes Bank
IAN Network
Greenlight Planet
Unilever
Seed Fund
Intellecap
Aavishkar
We will clarify our relationships soon enough... be ready for a grand presentation early August.
In Bombay:
Yes Bank
IAN Network
Greenlight Planet
Unilever
Seed Fund
Intellecap
Aavishkar
We will clarify our relationships soon enough... be ready for a grand presentation early August.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)